Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mussa Ekzekov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mussa Ekzekov[edit]

Mussa Ekzekov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, and WP:PROF. Emeritus Prof is honourary. Google Scholar lists two articles. Google Books and Amazon/B And N has nothing. Ref's don't seem to add up. scope_creep (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- has a well-developed ru.wiki article, and appears to be notable as a businessman and for civic involvement. For example, the claim that the funds for a sculpture to Dmitri Shostakovich were donated by his company checks out: link: "General Director of "Solomon" Moussa Ekzekov who initiated the creation of the monument and presented it to the city...". K.e.coffman (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - as per K.e.coffman. Seems to meet WP:BASIC as having received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.