Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Unity Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination, but no consensus at this time Go Phightins! 02:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Unity Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This community center appears to fail not only WP:ORG but even WP:GNG. Most of the sources are either sites tied to the organization itself, or profiles created in web directories as part of the center's digital footprint. A Youtube link is thrown in for good measure as well. There does appear to be a tiny amount of info on a university website, but that's it. This center isn't notable.
Also worth noting is that the article was created by an account which is either the official account of the center or an account posing as such, as can be seen at Special:Contributions/Muslimunity_center. MezzoMezzo (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  17:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.