Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim (singer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sources identified and apparently persuasive. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator contested PROD. Previously created at Muslim (rapper), moved to draft and also contested. Subject doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO, at least, not yet. No reliable source that gives WP:SIGCOV. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: it lacks of content and information. Also, not notable. There is almost no any inline references, 4 are given where 3 are not existing website. Serdaray85 (talk) 09:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep andMove to Muslim (rapper) Incredibly disappointing AfD. Has anyone actually bothered with a simple Google search? Muslim is the equivalent of Morocco's Jay Z or 50 Cent. He is one of the most prominent and influential representatives of rap in Morocco, Africa, and the Arab world. While I get that it's challenging when most sources are in foreign languages, there's plenty of substantial, independent coverage in reliable sources across multiple languages that took me less than a minute to find. Passes #1, #7, #8, and #11 in my opinion.
Pinging @Vanderwaalforces:, @Theroadislong:, @Oaktree b:, @Estar8806:, @HarukaAmaranth:, @Serdaray85:. Mooonswimmer 18:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While the sheer !votes here may point to a consensus to delete, Moonswimmer's contribution on 30 October deserves the opportunity to be further reviewed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as the multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion such as Spanish national newspaper articles about him, an academic journal, and others show when combined a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.