Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music (application)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Music (application)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Verging on an A7; I see no need for separate encyclopedia articles on these applications.

I am also nominating the following related article for deletion:

Delete I would recommend a redirect to the IOS article, but the titles for both articles are unlikely to be used or searched for that way. I say nuke'em. No need for two standalone arts that will be stubs for all eternity. §FreeRangeFrog 19:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — TORTOISE WRATH 17:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theo polisme 14:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references apparent. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero references. And the 2 sentence "content" says nothing useful.....doesn't even say 1 word on what this application is or does. North8000 (talk) 12:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note also the content on Videos (application), which was added only in response to its being listed as an A3. — TORTOISE WRATH 17:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.