Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muriel Frost (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muriel Frost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A relatively minor recurring character in DW, but there are literally no sources for her out there when I checked for BEFORE. There simply doesn't exist anything to justify GNG or SIGCOV, and the article already cites no sources. I'm not sure whether there are any good spots to redirect this article to, as she isn't mentioned at all in the Doctor Who Magazine article and I'm not sure if adding a mention there is a good idea or not, as that's the only good redirect target I can think of. Pokelego999 (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete why was this character even given an article to begin with? I know our notability standards were low in 2005, but every reoccurring DW character ever low? Dronebogus (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it would seem are standards were that low. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.