Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma[edit]

Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails WP:GNG. Horrible as it is, was, for the victim and for those who loved them, WP:NOTNEWS applies. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Article is based on news reports from when the crime took place and the subsequent court case; both of which could be viewed as primary sources. There needs to be further discussion and analysis of this crime in reliable sources to make it notable per WP:NEVENTReporting with little thematic connection or contextual information is often considered to be routine reporting. Does have an international aspect (Britain/Venezuela) the scope of reporting (national or global reporting is preferred) but doesn't seem to have had an impact on, for example, the countries relations. Haven't found reliable sources demonstrating a lasting WP:EFFECT. This from the essay WP:NOTABLENEWS sums up the situation with this article: Notnews articles are nothing more than summaries of an event. Something happens and then everything is successfully resolved and forgotten. Nothing happens in reaction to the event, no one significant reacts, no changes occur and no impact is demonstrated.. Maybe a bit harsh as this murder obviously has a severe impact and is not forgotten by close relatives and friends of the deceased, but it's coverage of the wider context that Wikipedia is concerned with and that's what is lacking here. Rupples (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.