Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Paul Broussard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

Murder of Paul Broussard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A sad tale but it fails the notability test; it appears to only be here because of alleged evidence of an LBGT hate crime $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 12:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close for non-good faith nomination. The nominator describes an "alleged" act, the article describes one for which they were convicted. Moreover, the nominator has sent out about a dozen of these AfDs in as many minutes, demonstrating fairly clearly that he or she hasn't even read the articles in question in violation of WP:BEFORE. --j⚛e decker ^talk 16:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suppport Procedural Close for reasons stated. If not, I will support Keep with arguments on the merits. Argos'Dad 19:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support close and Keep. Easily flies over WP:GNG. Insomesia (talk) 01:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support close and Speedy Keep - per nonsense nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if it comes to that, or procedural close per Joe Decker. An absurd and offensively-worded nomination. Rivertorch (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, satisfies notability criterion, coverage in multiple different secondary sources that fit WP:RS. — Cirt (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.