Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Kylie Maybury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Kylie Maybury[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable unsolved murder. TheLongTone (talk) 11:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Murder was notable enough to be included in books and has continued to receive publicity for the past 32 years. --GouramiWatcher^Talk 14:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not sure why this is unremarkable when it has so often been remarked on. More than passing mentions too. Meets notability criteria. Thincat (talk) 21:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very strange nomination. Clearly notable case. -Roxy the dog™ woof 11:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Indeed, absolutely bzarre nomination. Either way, the case has had both persistent and lasting coverage and that = notability. _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: this diff indicates he has a personal grudge against Murder of... articles. Speedy close of this AfD? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I thank you Paul Benjamin Austin- perhaps my original edit was not so far off the mark after all... thought it seemed familiar. _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's blatantly obvious he's got a grudge, if anyone was to look at his history of AfD-ing. Not to mention the lack of civility about it. --GouramiWatcher^Talk 14:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and snow close. Article is sourced and clearly meets WP:GNG. Bad faith AFD nominations are an anathema and a topic ban may be in order. MarnetteD|Talk 16:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, Anthony Bradbury? _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why ask me? I am not involved. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well exactly. Disinterested rather than uninterested. _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever happens, can TheLongTone be disciplined for bad faith, lack of civility and use of the en-wikipedia to indulge his grudges and obsessions? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.