Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Seen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Murder Seen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a film lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The film was apparently a direct to DVD release. The two references in the article are (1) a press release from the production compamy and (2) a dead link for an article in a university campus newspaper. My own searches for reliable source coverage does not find any. Whpq (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFILM with almost no independent sources (all I found was a single critical review from a site with a huge number of reviews on it) and no other criteria met -crh23 (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in looking further:

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

USA title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brazil theatrical:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brazil TV:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spain TV:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Italy:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: found the authored The Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film review, but as the film was released theatrically outside the USA, this needs a deeper look. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better and simply none of this suggests the necessary improvements. SwisterTwister talk 02:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.