Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Drones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murder Drones[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, perhaps simply WP:TOOSOON, perhaps it will just fail again. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Inadequately sourced, and does not satisfy general notability. This was moved back from article space to draft space and then moved from draft space to article space once, which is why nominator did not draftify again. Originator is being stubborn. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Series of articles written by same group of editors all promoting Glitch Productions. Does not satisfy general notability. Equine-man (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete I'm not seeing WP:N being met. [1] is all I'm finding... Hobit (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only finding the Gizmodo, which is not really enough. Artw (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, seems WP:TOOSOON at best. That said, Gizmodo is usually considered reliable, so one more good piece of coverage and this could pass. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but maybe we can bring it back after the series is completely finished.--24.44.76.88 (talk) 03:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.