Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Ekşioğlu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murat Ekşioğlu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero convincing reliable sources to established claimed notability; refs appear to be nothing more than the same recycled promotional/press releases. No independent coverage, does not meet WP:MUSIC. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to be a vanity article on a singer with no chart success or any following at all, having checked all social media. All of the sources look self-published and all have mostly identical content to each other, indicating that they were probably submitted by Murat himself. He's on all the usual self-published sources like Deezer, SoundCloud, IMDb etc. but nothing to indicate notability per WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are from unreliable sites which don't cover him deeply. Most "Kimdir?" sources are PR pieces anyways. Also has been speedied from trwiki 25 times, which isn't a good sign. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 13:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable. Cannot find any coverage in reliable sources. Keivan.f^Talk 01:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it should be deleted. If many artists can stay on Wikipedia when there are no references, then reference pages that provide information about a cited artist should remain. The artist is verified, especially because he is known on YouTube and TikTok, which means that he is well-known in his country, partially well-known in his country. People who do not know, write to the search results, already have information, recognize and follow them fondly. Let me be frank, I just got to know you, but I follow you with love. That's why I wanted to add and contribute to Wikipedia starting with the person I love. This means that it is significant. It doesn't need to be deleted. If they contain copyright, I would appreciate if the sources were removed with your help. Because I am the creator. You can also move it to the draft section. I lead the follow-up and development of the page and invite you as well. (Google Translate) Deryakayaer (talk) 13:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Deryakayaer[reply]
- Comment I already tried moving it to draft and asked you to go through the WP:AFC process; you ignored that advice and moved it back to mainspace, so here we are. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Being verified on social media doesn't mean anything for notability. I don't see a reason to draftify this. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 11:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.