Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muqadas Farooq Awan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 14:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muqadas Farooq Awan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OK, I don't read Urdu so cant see some of the references, but neither thos I can see or anythig in the article itself suggest notability...just a journalist doing their job , with the run-of-the-mill cover that generates TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - based on Google Translate, the first source is a tag search for articles she wrote and the other two are articles she directly wrote. The only new source proffered by IamNasirZaman (talk · contribs) on this AfD's talk page is a cite to Twitter, which is worthless for notability at any rate (no editorial oversight). As a precaution, I'm going to run this thru a copyvio checker (as two drafts Iam has written had plagiarised content), but as far as I can determine this doesn't establish notability in the first place and should be deleted as a result. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 17:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All references are primary sources. Gusfriend (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability not established. Articles written by the subject do not count towards notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: . I am just letting you know that I declined the deletion of Orkhan Mammadov, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is just not spammy. It's a short bio which is encylopedic, and then a short career history. He may well not be notable, but there's credible indication as president of the AZ Futsal assoc. Needs to go to

https://www.siasat.pk/forums/threads/%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B9%D8%B4%D9%82-%D9%85%DB%8C%DA%BA-%D8%BA%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%AA%D9%90-%D8%AC%D8%B0%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%86%DB%92-%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%DB%92-%D9%86%DB%81-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7.631079/
https://www.nawaiwaqt.com.pk/E-Paper/lahore/2018-05-29/page-15/detail-5

https://www.urdupoint.com/news/team/muqadas-farooq.html

Hello, I would like help understanding why my sources are not reliable. These sources are news papers and the subject of my Wikipedia page is focus of all the articles used. Other sources used were direct links to his repertoire. Any advice and assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. IamNasirZaman (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This vote has been copied from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Muqadas Farooq Awan. I reserve making any judgement on this AFD. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained why these sources are unusable in my delete argument. Repeating the same argument ad nauseam is not a winner at AfD. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 19:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Islam. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and block the creator as a SOA. This is nothing more than exaggerated vanity spam sourced to the usual suspects engaging in paid pr without identifying it (aka blackhat SEO) Also I'm pretty sure we've had this exact discussion before. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.