Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muojärvi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muojärvi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN lake - fails WP:NGEO. UtherSRG (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Finland. UtherSRG (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant coverage of watershed, etc. Meets GNG [1][2][3] —siro χ o 11:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Considerable coverage in sources:Meets GNG very clear.--Patricia (Talk) 12:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:GEOLAND is quite a low bar and this easily meets it. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Also worth noting that other Wikipedias have this article: Swedish, Finish, French, German and Egyptian Arabic. Existence on other Wikipedias is not binding here but it is telling. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 13:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly passes WP:GEONATURAL. SportingFlyer T·C 17:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.