Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munir Shah
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Munir Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable politican. Fails to meet WP:NPOL. While there is some coverage of a local election that went to a court ordered recount, these mainly deal with the case and people being injured during the cases rather than WP:significant coverage of Shah. Google searches not finding anything significant. noq (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. noq (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Politicians at the local level are not handed an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just because they exist — at this level of significance, the notability claim he would have to show is genuinely substantial evidence that he's much more notable than the norm for that level of office — but winning a local council seat on a recount is not evidence of that. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a failed local level politician. There is news coverage of every election, but we have refused to make every candidate who looses notable, so this is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:28, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NPOL & WP:SIGCOV. LefcentrerightDiscuss 22:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.