Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mundane cyborgs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mundane cyborgs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible hoax, article on parent family of cyborgs is nominated for speedy deletion. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 21:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO. I don't know if it's a hoax, but I can't find any Google hits outside of blogs. The "parent" article Intermittent cyborgs came up with a mere seven Ghits (and it was created by the same editor), so I propose we delete it as well. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like a group of students are trying to create new vocabulary to expand the traditional use of the term cyborg. Nuujinn (talk) 13:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.