Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiple pages about Egyptian movements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Editors concur that WP:NOTNEWS and WP:N don't seem to be met. However, given the decent state of at least a couple of the articles, I am more than happy to userfy if that would be helpful to build up existing content. Just drop me a line on my talk page. Go Phightins! 01:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC) Go Phightins! 01:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple pages about Egyptian movements ‎[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

I am nominating the following related pages:

Per WP:SUSTAINED, these articles about movements established during (Egyptian Crisis (2011–2014)) and take some propaganda then disappeared after few months, just a news story covered in many newspapers (WP:NEWSBRIEF), no notable works or effects, and nobody remember them, it obviously are (Subjects notable only for one event). Ibrahim.ID ✪ 16:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 16:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 16:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Almost a case of WP:NOTNEWS. Azuredivay (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Masmou3 - largely sourced to their own Twitter, doesn't really make any claim of notability. Only one source even claims to be reliable (a CNN video from 2013) but based on the article it's not likely to be very substantial, [1] is a trivial mention of the group in an interview with the person in that video that suggests the group is not notable. The other pages are weak for notability, but may be able to be merged rather than deleted. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.