Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multi-state CPUs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Multi-state CPUs[edit]
- Multi-state CPUs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A regular google search comes up with a few hits but nothing that indicates any coverage if this product even exists. Travellingcari (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - While a few of the ppt presentations that come up on Google indicate that this *might* be an emerging technology, or more likely, a possible future technology, it will need to emerge a bit more before it gets an article here. Right now fails WP:CRYSTAL. --JustaHulk (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 18:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment good someone more familiar with the industry (judging by your screen name) is on the same page as I am. I couldn't tell from the article whether or not it existed and PPTs weren't too clear either. Travellingcari (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Even still, wikipedia isn't a crystal ball Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 20:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment good someone more familiar with the industry (judging by your screen name) is on the same page as I am. I couldn't tell from the article whether or not it existed and PPTs weren't too clear either. Travellingcari (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This says it all. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Google Scholar and Google for "multi-state cpu" (sg.) and "multi[-]state processor" give some results.[1][2][3], [4][5][6] I haven't checked in detail; many of them seem to be using the term with a different meaning than the highly dubious "non-binary CPU" (in particular I've seen security and multi-tasking contexts). I'll go for a weak delete, but I'm not an expert on hardware. -- Lea (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and WP:CRYSTAL certainly applies. Seems pretty speculative. -- Lea (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.