Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mullets and Bars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mullets and Bars[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film. Fails WP:NFILM. Previously deleted via prod. One of a series of promotional articles from the same editor most of which have been deleted. noq (talk) 00:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found no sources on Google News, Google News Archive, HighBeam, Credo, Questia and NewsBank. Fails notability on all accounts. - Mr X 01:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KeepIt is an actual film that was produced and I did find external links. The article needs work and citation but I think it's noteworthy enough to keep around to flesh it out.METOKNOWONLY (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per my PROD a year ago: "Documentary that was shown once at "Raindance Film Festival" and never again, anywhere, in any forum, as far as I can tell. No non-trivial coverage in any independent reliable source." I see that the article claims that it's been screened twice. No evidence of notability and no reason to suppose that any exists. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this film meets WP:GNG or WP:NF. Gong show 08:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. --Dweller (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. It has been tagged for a long time. delete now, edit later per WP:NRSNVNA DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the film exists and has screened at a known festival... in the 8 years since screening, and even though it is now being distributed on DVD, it has not generated the requisite commentary and analysis. If this ever changes and this gains the requisite coverage, the article can be undeleted, but by all measures this currently fails WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.