Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhsin Khalid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted—copyvio. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muhsin Khalid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing unfinished AfD. I can't find any reason why it's been nominated, but I'm willing to bet that being an unreferenced BLP is up there. For this reason, I am 'neutral'. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete without prejudice to recreation. This appears to be the only readily available reliable source. Even if he actually meets WP:AUTHOR, the article would take far too much effort to fix, and the fact that it has been tagged for 18 months without any attempt to fix it suggests that it's not worth the candle. THF (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 01:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Of course, the article needs references and a lot of work. However, the article seems to be written in good faith, and the author has had many works published in both Arabic and English, as a Google book search shows. Jim Heaphy (talk) 04:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. A Google Books search shows nothing of the sort - it only finds the one sub-sentence mention linked above. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a copyright violation of [1] and the following pages found by clicking "next". I'll tag the article accordingly. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.