Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudman (SNK character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete then recreate as Redirect→World Heroes#Mudman --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudman (SNK character)[edit]

This is a character that does not have real world information to establish notability. It reads like a game guide, and there is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to World_Heroes#Mudman or delete as non-notable. I was going to suggest a merge, but there is only WP:NOT#GUIDEish and unsourced trivial content. – sgeureka ^t•c 20:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 17:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable outside of World Heroes. Wikipedia is not a game guide. Lankiveil (talk) 05:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect to World_Heroes#Mudman. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 08:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect per Sgeureka. The existence of this article is absolutely ridiculous considering how minor he is. JuJube (talk) 12:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (edit conflict with close, but eh). Does anyone know of a GFDL-compatible fighting-game-oriented Wiki (similar to TV Wiki) for this sort of stuff? While it is "nice" to have all this content, it's blatantly unencyclopedic - and this goes for the rest of the minor-SNK-fighting-game-character entries. Anyway, if there is a fighting game wiki, transwiki there, otherwise delete --Badger Drink (talk) 00:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.