Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muddy Waters (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muddy Waters (video game)[edit]

Muddy Waters (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources such that we could write a dedicated encyclopedia article on the topic without resorting to original research. Its only coverage is in passing, apart from one gameguide source (50 Fun Ways to Internet by Book-mart Press). The topic had no substantive additional analytical coverage in Google Books, Google Scholar, or a custom Google search of video game sources. There have been no sourcing improvements to the article since the last AfD and there are no worthwhile redirect targets, as our List of MUDs only lists games with their own articles. czar 22:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 22:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. czar 22:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Coverage is borderline but adds up a bit shy of WP:N imo. Probably when I wrote the article I was hoping that something else would show up that would kick it over the line, but that hasn't happened and it's had plenty of time. —chaos5023 (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Barely found anything about the game. Source #2 seem to be the only source which talks about the game, but that's not enough for the article to be notable. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 16:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 17:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and above. IceWelder [] 20:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.