Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudapilavu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Mudapilavu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mudapilavu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no citations and includes a lot of puffery. I also could not find any non-circular source on google, most that are not circular talk about an arcade. ✶Mitch199811✶ 19:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ✶Mitch199811✶ 19:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Hinduism, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - unsourced since 2008 and no latlon. I must disagree with nom on a lot of puffery -- the article is a total of 3 sentences. Walt Yoder (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

  I mean in my mind, 2/3 sentences containing puffery is a lot. One sentence is entirely puffery and the other has just general unneeded puffery. The second sentence is just a too locally orientated, seven-worded description of where it is. ✶Mitch199811✶ 00:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.