Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muckross Park College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Non Admin Close Dusti^{talk to me} 17:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muckross Park College

Article makes no assertion of notability. Google searches reveal nothing that meets the requirements at WP:SCHOOL (proposed guideline). —BradV 15:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately, no sources appear to be available to show notability. Despite trying to use evil primary sources (i. e. the school website) I cannot find anything substantial, as much of the site is "under construction". EJF (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC). Wisdom89 found sources so that's good enough for a keep from me. EJF (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —EJF (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Independent Dominican school founded over 100 years ago! Paste (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Bláthnaid 19:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 21:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Two points: 1.)per WP:SCHOOL, colleges, primary, junior and high schools, and universities are not deleted if notability is not ascertained. They are merged. 2.) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 21:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Merge may be an option for this school. Where should it be merged to?

Comment If it were merged, it would probably be a new section of Donnybrook, Dublin. Adam McCormick (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(2) Those links don't assert notability. The first is a primary source that says they got a new building. The second is an article talking about a school project (not mentioned in the article). The third states they got a new building as well, the fourth is a telephone directory, and the fifth says that a student that went there won an award (also not mentioned in the article). The analysis that the article makes no assertion of notability and I can't find anything notable on Google has not been proven wrong. —BradV 22:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given the tenuousness of the links provided, merge might be in order. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 00:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep A 1901 founded school probably has a minimum of required notability. It needs someone to add that info tho. --Stormbay (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A high school that's more than 100 years old almost certainly has notability somewhere. Hobit (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.