Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mucho-Bravado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mucho-Bravado

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No refs, no claim of significance other than existing. GregJackP Boomer! 18:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the following related page because notability not evident:

List of artists who have worked with Mucho-Bravado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Delete. I agree that there's nothing here that meets WP:CORP and I found nothing on a brief search; there are no reliable sources provided or found. I note also the linked page List of artists who have worked with Mucho-Bravado which should perhaps be linked to this AfD -- closing admin please note. Ubelowme _U ^Me 20:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not established, fails WP:CORP. WWGB (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:CORP as all sources provided are now reliable secondary/independent Music Industry news sources in Australia. Note: also meets guidlines based information provided on [Talk page]. 1fairywren —Preceding undated comment added 03:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - except the sources do not establish notability, as follows:

theMusic - apparently meets WP:RS;

Bigsound - does not meet WP:RS, it is a web brochure for a high school student run conference, trivial mention;

APRA/AMCOS - trivial mention;

Faster/Louder - is not a WP:RS, user-provided information like IMDb or a wiki-type forum;

Brisbane times - a WP:RS with no mention of Mucho-Bravado; and

Scene - a WP:RS, covers an event, trivial mention of M-B.

Unfortunately, these refs do not establish notability for M-B in any way, shape, or form. At that has been shown is that it exists, not that it is notable. GregJackP Boomer! 10:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with GregJackP that sources do not establish notability. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yet another attempt to use Wikipedia to promote Mucho-Bravado, Ben Preece (manager) and their bands. [1]. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A press relaease and passing mentions are not enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both the Mucho-Bravado page (no evidence that the firm does more than ply its trade, failing WP:CORPDEPTH) and the List of artists who have worked with Mucho-Bravado page ( which I previously Prodded as it "fails to meet WP:LSC" which I think remains so). AllyD (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.