Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mucahit Bilici

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Never close on one !vote but sources are fine and cites of any language can be used .... You can't always expect English news articles on foreign subjects.... (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 23:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mucahit Bilici

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete: After cleaning up this article to get a good look at what remains after the removal of unreferenced padding, and having searched the internet to see what the subject has been doing, I am convinced that he does not meet notability requirements. He's an academic, but that certainly doesn't bring notability by itself. He has published a book, which does not seem to have made any great or lasting impact, and a few articles that aren't widely cited. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he's well-known in Turkey (it's the same guy - compare his photo) -[1][2][3][4][5] —Мандичка^YO 😜 10:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear —Мандичка, thank you. But do you have sources in English that might help non-Turkish-speaking editors make a decision. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. You don't need sources in English. Just use Google translate and you can see the articles are about him. —Мандичка^YO 😜 11:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After translating the sources I can see he writes some columns and blogs in Turkey. Is this sufficient to establish notability. I don't think so. But let's see what other editors think. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.