Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr 2Kay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. Nomination withdrawn. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Mr 2Kay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails WP:NMUSIC. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep subject is absolutely and handsomely notable. passes WP:GNG. Stanleytux (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are funny! How does it passes WP:GNG? Where are the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that establish the subject notability? Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment:. After another look, I discovered the subject of the article meet WP:GNG. On this not am closing the debate as Keep. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.