Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Rajesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Rajesh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced film (has a Times of India review and a list of non-notable film review sites). DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as has at least one reliable sources review in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would appreciate a few more reviewers taking a look at this. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cites only one reliable source, which fails the multiple sources requirement of WP:GNG. Sandstein 19:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Movie does not have significant sources as per WP:NFSOURCES. GargAvinash (talk) 04:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.