Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Pumpkin Adventure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Pumpkin Adventure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was brought up in WP:VG by Zxcvbnm. A PROD was previously placed on this article, but has since been contested. The concern raised was that while the article does have sources, it does not have enough to satisfy the requirements of general notability. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Could only really find one, possibly two reliable significant secondary sources. Third review is from a community blog writer and everything else are short news articles._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video games-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search: sole review from Nintendo Life (specialty source) and some news coverage in Siliconera (also speciality). There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 17:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 16:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.