Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. L (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Mr. L (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mr. L (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film which does not appear to have any reviews or significant coverage, so meets neither WP:NFILM nor WP:GNG. I do note that it has received an award and a nomination but neither of these are at festivals that are significant enough to grant automatic notability in lieu of meeting any other notability guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete As per nom. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 04:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 08:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The fact that it only cites film festivals and IMDb is concerning. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 12:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked socks; see SPI. Mz7 (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Keep: I have seen this film, which is quite good. According to Taiwanese film critic Parrot Quail Youth-Leigh (李幼鸚鵡鵪鶉), he said that "Mr. L" is a very creative experimental film. Sudry (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Keep, The film is good enough to put it here. Why? The film review is just saying what is great about the film.Jenniferal1981 (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Keep: The sources already show sufficient significant coverage.Jamin Day (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete, the above "Keep" votes do not cite any relevant policy. Fails WP:NFILM. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.