Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. J Noxx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. J Noxx[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist ^talk|contribs 09:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article now claims U.S. charting but checking what U.S. is linked to we can see it is reverbnation, a badchart. A bunch of links have been dumped into the page but none good, shops, reverbnation, youtube, event listings, datpiff. Nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was thinking of closing this as a soft delete but it's been Proded before so that's not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For the sake of assisting the closing administrator, the deletion of this article would be in line with BIODEL (the final/third sentence), which you may mention in the close if deemed fit. Thanks. Lourdes 03:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.