Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement Strategies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Movement Strategies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources provided, no additional RS found in a WP:BEFORE aside from trivial coverage of the acquisition of the company. Clearly does not meet WP:NCORP. Tollens (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tollens (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found except routine database entries and social media, and every single reference in the article is linked to the company. No independent secondary coverage. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.