Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Party

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. There is no Wikipedia policy stating "state parties are not notable". Mass nominations are usually done with articles using the same set of sources (e.g., soccer player bios where the players only play in a semi-professional league). That's not the case here and editors have stated that each article should be judged individually on its own merits. Closed, but individual AFDs for the applicable articles may be opened. NeilN talk to me 13:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Party[edit]

Mountain Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These state parties are not notable. Suggest merge to List of state Green Parties in the United States. Many also have few to no sources. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated articles:

Speedy close an entirely improper way to discuss the merits of each party's notability. Nominate them individually. Unless your point is that non-state level political parties are not notable, it is impossible discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namiba (talk • contribs)
Nominations of multiple articles with a similar theme or topc are done all the time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is quite a messy mass-nomination. Some of the articles included have enough reliable sources to pass GNG, some don't. There's no way for anyone to give a definitive vote either way. I suggest a speedy close of this. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close This is quite a mess as the nominator has already merged content into the main article. Suggesting a mass undo of those and if desired to discuss and then renominate any significantly non-notable article. I would oppose quite a few of the above articles for deletion.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speed close/oppose Way too many articles grouped together to have a cogent discussion. I would in particular oppose the deletion of Mountain Party, which has its own history separate from its more recent affiliation with the Green Party. Bitmapped (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mountain_Party&oldid=1127484762"