Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Olive Church of God

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Olive Church of God[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If this was created today it would be speedied A7. Since it's now 11 years old, it's difficult to conclusively say that all of its revisions definitely qualify for A7 per WP:CSD (and I'm not going to go through them all just to avoid an AfD), but the current one certainly does.

Searches turn up lots of trivial mentions, but basically all appear to be "so and so, who died tragically, was a member of Mount Olive Church of God, and is interred at such and such place". Nothing to indicate notability. TimothyJosephWood 18:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. This reads like someone took it directly from a pamphlet which means this is likely and entirely, a WP:copyright violation. Fails WP:GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 19:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, was not nominated for speedy due to the large number of previous revisions. TimothyJosephWood 14:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are trivial mentions, as TimothyJosephWood notes, but nothing beyond that. Ok the church exists, is active, hosts fireworks, has people that die and get mentioned in obituaries, but the church itself isn't notable. This article has existed for a long, long time. There was a prior AfD in 2006 that closed as no consensus. But, I think the closer there made a mistake. Two of the keep recommendations there were from single purpose accounts that have never edited before or since. 10 years on, there's still nothing to indicate notability. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.