Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Hack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion - "Unreferenced geographical stub" is as about as invalid as it gets!. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 04:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Hack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced geographical stub. smileguy91^{Need to talk?} 02:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. A nominator has the obligation to check WP:BEFORE. References to its existence are not hard to come by.[1][2][3] Clarityfiend (talk) 02:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep sources have been added. Geogene (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The relevant deletion criterion, WP:DEL-REASON #7, says "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". As per above, nominator failed to check for sources as per WP:BEFORE. Esquivalience ^t 03:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.