Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Gambier Marketplace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Gambier Marketplace[edit]

Mount Gambier Marketplace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches have simply found nothing better at all aside from expected news at News and that's not surprising considering this is only a local shopping area founded within the last 4 years, nothing at all convincing of any independent notability. It's not surprising this was started the month this place opened and that it's been quiet since, symmetrical to my searches also, I would've PROD this too and, also at best, sought deletion sooner. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG and content is mostly only a list of stores that exist currently, which also fails WP:NOTDIR (Ajf773 (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC))[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing notable here. By the way, don't be fooled by the two seemingly different references in the article -- they're both to the same web article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.