Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Copaja
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 05:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a tricky one, so bear with me while I explain. This (orphan) article has remained a ten-word stub for nearly a year (I was the last editor, stubbing it last March). It may be a real place, and as such I am loath to afd it, but... it doesn't even say what country it is in, so technically it could be speediable. Google returns about 650 non-wikipedia hits for "Copaja", but many of them are for the website of Felipe Copaja, or for scientist Sylvia (S.V.) Copaja, or for other people with Copaja as their surname. Of the first 120 google hits, only one was for a Mt. Copaja, and that 404'ed. Unless there is some extension of this article, or at the very least confirmation of the mountain's existence, it doesn't really have a place here. Grutness...wha? 06:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK - good work Lukas - it looks keepable now. The alternative spelling may have been what fooled google. Grutness...wha? 00:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lack of context and verifiability problems as Grutness pointed out. Also, a 5097 m cliff? Take a look at the cliff article to see how tall the world's highest cliffs are. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep per Lukas's research and expansion verifying the existence. The subject, once verified is valid, the problem with the original article has now been adressed. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The web reference is here: [1]. It doesn't give the country, but a reference grid. I found two other, higher peaks with the same grid position, and they are described as being in the Western Andes on the border between Chile and Bolivia. Perhaps someone can look it up in an Atlas? "Cliff" is just non-native English for "peak", I guess. Lukas (T.|@) 09:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unverifiable. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 11:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've found more information and added to the article. It now has exact co-ordinates and three web references, including the American government's GEONet Names Server database. "Copaja" is a variant form of "Capaja". Lukas (T.|@) 13:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the rewritten version and thanks to Lukas. Capitalistroadster 23:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.