Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount&Musket: Battalion
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mount&Musket: Battalion[edit]
- Mount&Musket: Battalion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game mod. Disputed prod and I don't think A7 can apply to video games, so I figured I'd turf it here. Kevin (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - could not verify through reliable secondary sources. If a source can be located, consider summarizing at Mount&Blade instead of a separate article. Marasmusine (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- @ Kgorman, pardon? this mod is one of the most popular mods on mount and blade warband, oh and the mod is on mount and blade: WARBAND, not the first mount and blade— Preceding unsigned comment added by 33rd rec john (talk • contribs)
- Thanks for clarifying. We can redirect and summarize at Mount&Blade: Warband, then, if someone can find one piece of verification from a reliable secondary source. Marasmusine (talk) 08:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.