Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mott (live oak)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Transwiki to Wiktionary. Nakon 01:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mott (live oak)[edit]
- Mott (live oak) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article has no room for any growth and is a non-notable neologism and it should therefore be deleted because wikipedia is not a dictionary. The topic is not notable for inclusion in wikipedia even though it is verifiable is does not meet WP:N it is WP:NEOLOGISM and possibly WP:OR in addition to this it violates WP:NOTDICTIONARY, transwiki to wiktionary and delete. Myheartinchile (talk) 20:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. Corvus cornixtalk 20:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a type of tree growth.
Should be tranwikied jJust like Apple tree isn't being transwikied, so shouldn't this be transwikied. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep or transwiki? Which is it? Corvus cornixtalk 05:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response: see thats the thing it's not a word for tree growth its George Bush's word for a tree growth, also as you said it is a word not a concept such as an "orchard" or "victory garden" which are notable and deserving of an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myheartinchile (talk • contribs) 22:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary as per WP:NOT. This isn't a topic that can have much more than a definition written about it. Tim Vickers (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.