Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorhead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. —freak(talk) 15:49, Sep. 27, 2006 (UTC)

Motorhead (game)[edit]

Obscure non notable game.--M8v2 21:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep The game is not obscure and came from the guys which gave you Pinball Dreams and Pinball Fantasies. At the time it was one of the better racing games around. --Frodet 21:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep as a notable game and legit gaming stub. The AfD nom is a "former vandal" and this reeks of vandalism through abuse of templates. NeoFreak 05:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Simonkoldyk 05:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - satisfies WP:SOFTWARE, asserts notability strongly e.g. "Motorhead was nominated for the BAFTA Interactive award in October 1998. It has so far sold more than one million copies.". MER-C 09:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Frodet and User:NeoFreak. JIP | Talk 09:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's Notable but it should be expanded.--Team6and7 20:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above GShton 21:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have re-created the article at Motorhead (game) and made Motorhead a disambiguation page. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 23:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There is no disambiguation between Motorhead and Mötorhead. This is not the topic of this AfD. Please revert. --Frodet 10:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please think of the people who come to Wikipedia looking for information about the band. It is a very, very notable band, and the average user doesn't put umlauts in search engine windows. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 19:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - This is an encyclopedia — it's about enlightening people and there is no disambiguity involved. For those looking for the band (and who is to decide which is more notable?), arriving at the game, there is a dab link to the band, for the convenience for the users who don't use umlauts. Furthermore, if you had bothered to read the talk page, which you failed to correctly move together with the article, you would have seen that this was already discussed there and no consensus was reached. Again, please revert and list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. --Frodet 20:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - No. I disagree. It is fine the way it is now. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 20:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MER-C. This is a game that passes WP:SOFTWARE. --- The Bethling ^(Talk) 01:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, is this a serious nomination? Explain how it is non-notable, please. RFerreira 04:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An obvious keep, is this nomination for real? // Liftarn 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.