Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcenter Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motorcenter Norway[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect, without improvements, with zero in-depth coverage from reliable independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Norway. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep w/ a serving of fish - Easily passes GNG with coverage in Norwegian sources which have been added to the article by Sauer202. Specifically, I am satisfied by ABC Nyheter and Norsk Porsche providing in-depth coverage, though others have been added which I will not bother combing through at the moment, since I have already demonstrated a GNG pass. The ease and speed at which these were added to the article leads me to believe that Norwegian sources were not even bothered to be checked by the nominator, which I am concerned is similar behaviour to which the nominator finds themselves currently at ANI for. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two sources linked to by GhostOfDanGurney are strong indicators of notability and there are many more in the article. Cullen328 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.