Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother Chantal SABS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't find the keep argument persuasive in the absence of non-local sources. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Chantal SABS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability in the article or found online. Multiple search terms are possible, but the result are largely primary or unreliable sources (e.g. like this). Fram (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheSaintsGuy may or may not be relevant here; just sayin' Elizium23 (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have moved the article to a more appropriate name of Mary Francesca de Chantal, FYI. Elizium23 (talk) 02:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete @Elizium23: Thanks to share but investigation is not relevant here because page is created before getting blocked but the sources are not reliable. My vote is delete after [1], [2], [3]. 1друг (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- The rename was appropriate, but the order she founded has no article and her canonisation is only by the local diocese. None of this is enough to make her notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think being declared a Servant of God, the first step on the way to canonisation, is sufficient for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just not enough coverage for notability, as her canonisation was only local.Jackattack1597 (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.