Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother3.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mother3.org[edit]

Non notable website, failing web notability (hasn't been featured in important media, hasn't won a well known and independent award, neither is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators). Alexa rank of 304,480, forum with 401 members, notability claim is that they are currently translating a game, Mother 3. Site is fairly empty (Download and Tutorials sections are empty), with few links. Deprodded without comment.^[1] -- ReyBrujo 04:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I wish them luck since Nintendo doesn't seem to have any intention of localizing the game, but they are not-notable. TJ Spyke 04:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being in the process of translating a game isn't notable. Perhaps we should revisit this when they've actually finished the job. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Blood red sandman 12:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but leave open to re-creation later if they finish the job and it becomes popular (which is very possible, given how popular the Mother/Earthbound series is). --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 12:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An article for a fan translation site that doesn't even have a single release? Priceless. Show me a beta patch and then we'll talk. Garrett^Talk 21:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article seems more like an advertisement to me, and the website has hardly any members. --Kurotsyn 21:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.