Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mossie Lyons
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 00:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mossie Lyons[edit]
- Mossie Lyons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable individual, no reliable secondary sources, does not meet WP:ATHLETE exception to WP:N. 2008Olympianchitchat 19:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Appears to be notable within the sport. An unsourced article is no reason to delete. Jenuk1985 | Talk 19:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Jenuk, but because of BLP requirements, it needs to be rewritten with some sources very soon. And could all these hurling AfDs not have been grouped?! ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 20:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per WP:GAA guidelines ,WP:ATH and the above Gnevin (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Fulfills all criteria of WP:ATH. Amatuer athlete playing at the very highest level in his sport. ManfromDelmonte (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Verifibaly meets WP:ATHLETE's conferment of notability on an athlete who plays at this highest level of a sport, because inter-county matches are the highest level of GAA competition. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is a notable athlete who has played at the highest level of his sport. He is most certainly notable at a national level. Derry Boi (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.