Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morningside Equities Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Morningside Equities Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a non-notable company. I am unable to find any references that are not mere mentions or directory type listings. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 19:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with the above. Gdfusion (talk) 23:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lots of references with this search I added three to the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The search mentioned above and a similar on Highbeam, turn up various mentions of the company, generally in news items about the approvals process for particular developments. But developments are what developers do, and attract associated local coverage; it simply verifies existence as an operating firm. I am not seeing any specific in-depth coverage of the firm as such which could demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 05:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I don't think just using the local newspaper is what a global encyclopedia should be doing. Outside of Chicago and Ann Arbor, I don't see much other than Businessweek. Everything else is just job mentions.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.