Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mordechai Hager

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mordechai Hager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not as bad as the version I deleted as unsourced spam, but relies on a single obituary in a sympathetic publication. If he was genuinely notable I 'd expect multiple mentions in a wider range of RS sources Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 06:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 06:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I'll raise the Hamodia obit with an obit in the NYT which is generally a very strong indication of notability. This book - has some 4 pages on him. I added an interwiki to hewiki and yiwiki which have more sources (amply satisfying GNG). This was a rather major community leader the Viznitz hasidim in the US (Monsey) being fairly large, and his authority over this community being nearly absolute. Article creator is a newbie, and the article needs work, but WP:DONTBITE.Icewhiz (talk) 07:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think most of the above issues are already solved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by תנא קמא (talkcontribs) 14:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.