Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montenegro–Ukraine relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Montenegro–Ukraine relations[edit]
- Montenegro–Ukraine relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
neither country has a resident embassy, and a state visit or a meeting of deputy leaders [1] doesn't make for notable relations. lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations, quite a few multilateral mentions. [2]. agreeing to cooperate on money laundering is very common between any states who want to trade [3]. LibStar (talk) 08:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 15:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 15:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not database of X-Y relation type of articles. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Pavel Vozenilek and the nom. JBsupreme (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Some independent sources have been added to the article that comment on aspects of this new relationship and establish notability. I don't follow the "not a database" argument. Wikipedia is a repository of information about all sorts of things, including notable relations between countries. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Inadequately researched nomination as proven by Aymatth2's substantial improvements to the article. concerns about notability have been addressed. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable and verifiable. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.