Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montana Bay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that this person does not pass either WP:PORNBIO or WP:GNG. NW (Talk) 19:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Montana Bay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 15:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not present intersections from independent reliable secondary sources. It's a name in a list. Algébrico (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, no other indication subject meets the GNG. So nn, even as a porn model, that in the (safesearch off) Google image search on her name, more pictures of horses come up than of this model. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No evidence of passing WP:PORNBIO. TheoloJ (talk) 19:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.