Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montana Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Montana Avenue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if a notable enough street. Doesn't follow article conventions. Needs to be throughly cleaned-up and perhaps split if kept Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 03:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Montana Avenue is known for being a very chic and upscale retail district in Los Angeles and Santa Monica. There is coverage from the likes of Los Angeles Magazine and the Los Angeles Times [1][2] and the book Hometown Santa Monica: The Bay Cities Book. [3] --Oakshade (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the Texas and England stuff is gone, the article is kinda short, and it still needs to be rewritten Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 16:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's enough third-party coverage for the street/district to meet notability criteria. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.