Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It may be prudent to await a community consensus at the beauty pageant RFC before nominating again. A Traintalk 12:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Day[edit]

Monica Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being Miss Ohio USA and being a local television news anchor are neither enough to establish notability and that is all we have John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • (addend: Possibly) Redirect to Miss Ohio USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. Another option is to redirect to WCMH-TV. North America1000 06:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.