Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolian Migration
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mongolian Migration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The purpose of the article is unclear, it combines snippets of information that is given more appropriately elsewhere. The title isn't a commonly used term and has no clear definition besides the trivial fact that nomadic people happen to migrate in one form or another. Most of the article text talks about different subjects than the title. Latebird 02:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I agree with Latebird. I don't see the point of the existence of the article. Causesobad → (Talk) 02:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This could go in other articles. mrholybrain's talk 02:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense/test page. I'm confident that all of the useful facts in here are already contained elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lugnuts (talk • contribs) --Latebird 15:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with something, if there is anything worth merging. The article at present consists of three unrelated pieces of infomration, and perhaps not even wholly accurate - I think a yurt is made of felt, not leather. Peterkingiron 18:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Half the article belongs in Mongol Empire, and another half is original research strung together by articles that don't actually back up any claims. Maybe this is a notable topic, but the article itself has not shown this. Delete this until an editor comes to make a real article out of the topic. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 02:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per HongQiGong. Nothing salvageable here. --Richard 05:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.